Hi All,
This appexchange app helps in viewing the hierarchy view of any standard/custom object. It is free and very easy to use. You can view the hierarchy of more than 300 levels.
1 comment
Featured group
All About AppExchange
Hello everyone,
We tested Lead Capture - for Facebook - for Sales Cloud a couple a weeks ago on a sandbox and it perfectly worked.
Now we were about to install in production and got the newest release of Lead capture. Using the same installation process we were not able to make it work even after a proper deinstallation both on SF and Facebook Business side.
Installting this new release on a sandbox again, we saw that it does not work neither.
Furthermore, there is no connection issue since debug log shows that the apex controller sfleadcaphfprod__Lead_Capture has been executed.
Has anyone been able to make this new release work ? Is there a difference in installation processing ?
Thanks in advance for your help
Regards
7 answers
For anyone else with this issue, I tried @Borja Valenciano
's suggestion to view frame source but when I log in again it doesn't work.
Instead, while on the view-source: page in my browser, I removed that to load the URL again directly and it worked.
Body:
I am seeking help regarding a permission issue with the AppExchange package "Image Uploader."
[The Issue]
When a non-admin user clicks the delete button in this tool, the following error occurs, preventing the deletion (unlinking) of the file: "You do not have delete permission to the related record."
[What we have verified]
- System Administrator: Can delete without issues.
- Standard Profile Users: Cannot delete via the tool, even if they have "Delete" permission on the Opportunity object and are the record owner (or higher in the role hierarchy).
- Testing: The deletion only succeeds when we grant the "Modify All Data" system permission to the user.
[Request for help]
For security reasons, we want to avoid granting "Modify All Data" to standard users. Is there any way to bypass this error and allow non-admins to use the delete function without admin privileges?
If anyone knows of specific Apex class access requirements, hidden package settings, or a specific Permission Set that resolves this, please let us know.
2 answers
Probably the issue is because the button deletes files, which are special records. Until recently only admins or users with 'Modify All Data' permission could delete files, however, Salesforce introduced a new feature in the profile settings that allows you to grant non-admin users permission to delete files.
https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=release-notes.rn_experiences_files_delete_files.htm&release=260&type=5
Hi all, I'm new to omnistudio and been getting an Error:" Omnistudio :DML currently not allowed ( an unexpected error has occurred . Your solution provider has been notified)." when accessing the Omnistudio omniscripts in the newly refreshed sandbox , How do I resolve this? @* Salesforce Administrators *@* Salesforce Developers *@* Customer Success *@All About AppExchange
3 answers
The custom ones that are missing probably need to be migrated from another environment - our past two sandbox refreshes have not migrated our custom omnistudio components (Omniscripts, Datamappers, etc.) into the newly refreshed org.
Hello,
I have a question regarding security best practices for a managed package that we are preparing for Salesforce Security Review and AppExchange listing.
We have developed a managed package that performs an external API callout from an Apex class. As part of the integration logic, the Apex class sends record data from the following standard objects to an external endpoint:
- Lead
- Account
- Contact
- User
- Individual
The data is transmitted in the request payload to an external system for processing.
My questions are:
- From a Salesforce Security Review perspective, is sending standard object data (including User and Individual records) to an external API considered a security concern by default?
- What are the key compliance or security expectations Salesforce evaluates in such scenarios?
- Are there specific controls or patterns recommended to ensure this passes Security Review (e.g., explicit user consent, encryption standards, field-level filtering, etc.) ?
- Are there any red flags specifically related to transmitting User or Individual object data externally ?
- Is there limitations or concerns in sending all fields in the standard objects ?
We are planning to submit the package for Security Review soon and want to proactively address any potential concerns before submission.
Appreciate any guidance or insights from those who have gone through a similar review process.
Thanks in advance!
1 answer
It is legitimate to send data out to an external API. Even if it is standard objects or user-related data.
You will need:
1. Provide details about the endpoint and show it apply to all security requirements.
2. The connection details (such as keys/passwords) are stored securely.
Hello Everyone!
I have a use case where I need to integrate a form (Google or any type of web form) to Salesforce contact's fields. Is there any third party free apps to achieve this? How secure is this integration of google forms with any such apps? Please pour your suggestions.
Please advice. Thank you.
5 answers
We’ve done it with Skyvia by taking the Google Sheet responses and syncing them into Salesforce with explicit mapping and validation. It has a freemium that you can use for your task.
Hello,
does someone in this group have experience with Veeam Backup?
I am working with a company that is using Veeam Backup and it seems that some automated operation has updated active validation rules (e.g. for Opportunities and Leads) and added
AND(!$Permission.VeeamBackupBypassAutomation,
to all of them.
Also a new permission set
VeeamBackupBypassAutomation was created.
Does this sound familiar to someone here?
What setting/configuration in Veeam Backup has caused this?
Thanks, Sue
2 answers
,
thanks a lot for your comment and the information!
Currently the Veeam permission set is not assigned to any user, not even to the user which is currently used for the Veeam connection. So it doesn't seem to be fully setup to actually make use of this bypass logic.
Hi All,
I have Tested importing few Tasks into an Account through DataLoader with the Created Date back dated when it was created in my Previous Org. I was able to edit the Created date by following the steps of article
https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=000386065&type=1
, however as per this article I'm unable to insert the Last Modified Date when inserting records. And below is example of a Task Record that was imported.
However All the tasks that has been imported shows under this month (today) under the "Activity View" of an Account, although the Created Date is back dated 2017 etc. Is it possible to override this behaviour in the Activity view.
I have tested modifying an an earlier record from December & seeing if the Task will move to this month in the Activity View which it hasn't, which means that the Last Modified Date Is not dependant for this behaviour. Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks!
@* Salesforce Developers * @Salesforce.org System Administrators @All About AppExchange @Admin Addicts @Salesforce Flow Automation @Slack Developers @Developer Group, Ahmedabad, IN
1 answer
@Avishka Hettiarachchi - Please check if "Allow Users to Relate Multiple Contacts to Tasks and Events" feature is enabled under Setup > Customize > Activities > Activity Settings. If it is enabled, then it will not reflect the Last Modified Date and Last Modified By values as per this documentation. Values Not Populated in 'Last Modified Date' and 'Last Modified By' Fields
Customize > Activities > Activity Settings." style="display: block;" />
I'm using the SF labs app Enhanced Files List in a community. I have three sites in my org. Downloading single files work, but when users try to use download all fields, it gives a errorduringprocessing.jsp error. I can see the button is failing to add my site name to the URL:
- This would work, it works when I enter it manually in the browser: <mydomain>.
my.site.com/Site name/sfc/servlet.shepherd/version/download/xxxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxxx
- the button is creating a link that doesn't include the SiteName piece, so it errors.
Is anyone else dealing with this? The app hasn't been updated in years, so I assume there is no much hope of fixes.
Thank you!
2 answers
@Aline Araujo Santos I am experiencing the same issue. Did you ever find a solution? Or have another LWC you recommend?
Is there a good way to see a weekly or monthly digest of new new apps launched on AppExchange?