π₯ Introducing - The FLOWERS Framework for Salesforce Flows πΈ
Salesforce Flow has become the core automation engine of the platform and it's incredibly powerful. π
But let's be honestβ¦ with great power comes a lot of tangled logic, inconsistent design decisions, and automation that is hard to scale or maintain π
That's why I am excited to share the enhanced "FLOWERS" Framework - a memorable and practical approach for designing scalable, secure, optimized, and well-governed Salesforce Flows.
The FLOWERS Framework is built to help teams,
π Standardize automation design
π Improve maintainability
π Strengthen security & compliance
π Enhance performance
π Reduce technical debt
π Build with confidence
This framework is based on my learnings and experiences working with Flow and it will continue to evolve as the platform grows and new features roll out. π±
If you have seen patterns, best practices, or pitfalls I missed, I would love to hear them. π
Drop your suggestions or improvements in the comments so we can continue refining this together as a community. π
LinkedIn Newsletter -
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/flowers-framework-salesforce-flows-logesh-matheswaran-ruvoc
This framework is not part of the Winter β26 release. Itβs an independent framework that I created.
@Dimitar Nikolov You can find it here.
@Andy Engin UtkanThanks. Sure, will think about it.
@Daryl MoonTo answer to your question
1. The naming conventions provided in the article are
illustrative examples, not mandatory rules. Every organization has its own established naming standards, and these examples can be adapted accordingly. The same applies to Subflow naming conventions.
2. KISS applies to usage, not to the absence of conventions.
