Skip to main content
Featured group

* Sales Cloud - Getting Started *

Welcome! This group is dedicated to helping customers new to Sales Cloud get up and running quickly. Join the conversation here to ask questions, get answers, stay updated, and share experiences. --------------------------------------- This group is maintained and moderated by Salesforce employees. The content received in this group falls under the official Forward-Looking Statement: http://investor.salesforce.com/about-us/investor/forward-looking-statements/default.aspx

I wanted to see what is the best approach to take for the below scenario outlined.   

We are currently exploring how best to incorporate a stream of our business into Salesforce. This side of the business would contain a project and multiple phases. While we plan to utilise Opportunities to capture the overarching (parent) project, the complexity arises in how we manage the delivery structure of the phases. Many of these projects can include a significant number of phases often 20, 30, or even 50+ each with its own associated value and cost etc.  The project would have a different sales process and custom fields to the phases so i understand if it is opportunities (and child Opps) we have to go with seperate RTs will be needed.   

Given this, we’re unsure whether standard Opportunity records alone are the most effective solution. 

I would greatly value any thoughts on how best to implement this in our org.    

 

@* Sales Cloud - Best Practices *  @* Sales Cloud - Getting Started * 

7 answers
  1. Jun 4, 3:21 PM

    Hi @Catriona Cassidy

     

    We actually have a similar model internally. 

     

    • Opps represents the deal (High-level project/deal)
    • Each opp may have multiple phases (custom object)
    • Each phase may have multiple items (custom object MD to Phases)

     

    When an opp closes 1 or multiple projects get created (based on the number of phases). 

    Phases has a status to differentiate between a currently approved phase, future approved phase and not approved phase. Only the currently and future approved phases generates a project 

    Projects have requirements (Phases items) and multiple invoices 

     

    At the end, opportunities are use for forecasting and invoices are actuals

0/9000

Greetings! I am exploring Account Plans for our users. We do NOT use the standard opportunity object. Has anyone found a way to associate custom objects with account plans? For example,setting an objective. There seems to be no way to add custom objects to this related record drop down:  

 

Account Plan & Custom Opportunity Object

 

image.png

 

@* Sales Cloud - Best Practices * @* Sales Cloud - Getting Started *

 

 

#Sales Cloud

3 answers
  1. Jun 4, 3:03 PM

    Thank you both for your time. I will let my customer know. Hopefully, in the future, custom objects can be added to account plans and the Account Plan KPI component is customizable. :-)

0/9000

I’m currently setting up Email-to-Case, but I’ve hit a hard roadblock with our institutional IT policies. Our IT department enforces a strict, global block on auto-forwarding emails to external addresses for security reasons.   

Since the standard out-of-the-box Email-to-Case fundamentally relies on that forwarding rule, I need an alternative way to get our support inbox flowing into Salesforce.

For those of you in higher ed who have faced similar strict policies:   

  1. What alternative architecture did you use? Did you leverage Power Automate/middleware, an AppExchange tool, or something else to "pull" the emails via API?
  2. If you did successfully get an exception from IT, how did you frame the request to get them comfortable with the setup?

Any insights or specific tool recommendations would be hugely appreciated!   

 

@* Sales Cloud - Best Practices *  @* Service Cloud *  @* Sales Cloud - Getting Started * 

4 answers
0/9000

Hi Trailblazers! We're excited to share the the Summer ‘26 Release Overview Deck! For those of you who are new to this asset, it's a visual companion to the Release Notes and walks you through many of the newest enhancements. Use the quick links to jump through the deck to review new features and functionality for various clouds. 

 

11 comments
  1. May 31, 11:11 AM

    Is there any way to see these documents exaample in customer success or private groups as ouur company blocked the google slides or google drive accessing.

0/9000
3 comments
0/9000
1 comment
0/9000

On trying to save the record error is thrown    SF-Pricing-00006: The value specified for the evaluation resource for ListOperation33#1 isn’t valid. Enter a valid value for the evaluation resource and try again. SF-BRE-00004: We couldn't simulate the step because one or more specified resources don't have corresponding values for evaluation.

@* Salesforce Revenue Cloud * 

2 answers
  1. Josh Priem (Freelance) Forum Ambassador
    May 26, 1:49 PM

    Good Morning! 

     

    These errors typically occur in RCA when your Pricing Procedure uses a Business Rules Engine (BRE) step that fails to find a required input variable for the data context. You'll need to review your rules to find out where it is missing informaiton. 

     

    Cheers!

0/9000
E K asked in #Security

Hi,

I’m facing an inconsistent permissions issue across environments.

I created:

  • A Permission Set with Read access to several objects, including Engagement Interaction.
  • A Permission Set Group (PSG) containing this Permission Set.

In DEV and QA environments:

  • After assigning the PSG to a user, the user can see the Engagement Interaction tab and access the object correctly.

In the UAT environment:

  • The same Profile, License, License Assignments, and PSG are assigned to the user.
  • The user is using the same App, which is identical across all environments.

However, the user still cannot see the Engagement Interaction tab and has no access to the object.

Has anyone encountered the same issue where a user cannot access an object or see its tab in one environment, even though all configurations and permissions are identical across environments?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you!   

 

@* Sales Cloud - Best Practices *  @* Sales Cloud - Getting Started * 

1 answer
  1. Divya Chauhan (Kcloud Technologies) Forum Ambassador
    May 22, 1:04 PM

    Hello @E K

    Permission Set Groups often have issues with Tab visibility.

    Go to the individual Permission Set (not the Group).

    Open Object Settings --> Engagement Interaction.

    Set Tab Settings to Default On or Available.

    Save the Permission Set.

    Go back to Permission Set Group --> Click Recalculate.

    Test the user again.

    Additional Quick Checks:

    Ensure the Permission Set has a User License assigned (matching the user).

    Assign the individual Permission Set directly to the user (to test if Group is the issue).

    Clear browser cache and hard refresh.

0/9000

🎉 Big shoutout to our incredible Forum Ambassador, @Manoj Nambirajan for an awesome deep dive on "Map additional Lead data during Salesforce Import"!📘 Check out the article here >> https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?language=en_US&id=005322015&type=1 

 

🔍 Found it helpful? Have thoughts to share?

 Let us know by clicking the "Yes" or "No"  button at the bottom of the article—your feedback helps us improve!🎉 Big shoutout to our incredible Forum Ambassador, for an awesome deep dive on> 🔍 Found it helpful?" style="display: block;" /> #Sales Cloud

3 comments
0/9000

Hello group, could you help me define the best option for packaging solutions that are not intended for commercial sale but that I want to export and install in other production organizations in other regions?

 

@* Salesforce Developers * 

2 answers
  1. May 20, 10:59 AM

    We need to package a solution that can be installed in multiple Salesforce production orgs across different regions. The solution is not intended for commercial sale, but it should be easy to deploy, maintain, and upgrade.

    What would be the best packaging option in this scenario?

    I would appreciate guidance on whether Managed Packages, Unlocked Packages, or another approach would be the most suitable choice for distributing and maintaining the solution across organizations.

    Thank you in advance for your insights and recommendations.

    If you find this question relevant or valuable, kindly consider marking it as the Best Answer so it can help others facing a similar scenario.

0/9000