Sylvera has just published a new data report, which provides an overview of all the offsetting projects in the voluntary carbon markets, and includes Sylvera data and insights on REDD+ projects. The purpose is to help first time to experienced buyers better navigate the VCMs. (Report here.)
🔍 What does our ratings data reveal?
- Nearly a third (31%) of REDD+ projects we’ve rated are high quality.
- But 25% are very low quality, and therefore, not fit for offsetting claims.
- Everything in between requires closer examination before investing.
🛍️ What does this mean for carbon offset buyers?
- Companies with science-based climate strategies that want to genuinely offset their emissions and avoid being called out for greenwashing, have options.
- But they must do the due diligence, actively seek out legitimate projects and be ready to potentially pay a premium.
3 answers
I wouldn't push on offsets (and exchange of such) specially after the policies coming from COP27
Also, we all breathe the same air (https://twitter.com/Inescapinezka/status/1497536625596903424)
