Skip to main content

#CRM Configuration62 人正在讨论

 I'm interested in learning how organizations adapt Salesforce to match their unique business processes. What customization tools and features are commonly used, and how these customizations improve efficiency or business outcomes?  

 

#CRM Configuration  #Salesforce Developer  #Salesforce Admin

6 个回答
  1. 今天,15:41

     Businesses customize Salesforce using a mix of configuration and light development to align the platform with their processes.  

     

    They mainly use custom objects and fields to model business data, page layouts and Lightning pages to control UI, and Flow for automation like approvals, routing, and updates. Validation rules ensure data quality, while reports and dashboards provide tailored business insights.  

     

    Security is handled through roles, profiles, and permission sets to control data access. 

    For more complex needs, Apex is used for backend logic, Lightning Web Components for custom UI, and APIs for integrations with external systems.  

     

    These customizations improve efficiency by reducing manual work, enforcing consistent processes, and enabling better visibility into business operations. 

0/9000
2 个回答
  1. 昨天,10:14

    If Position isn't showing in the Related To dropdown, first make sure you're creating the Master-Detail field on the Job Posting object and that Position already exists as an object in your org.

    If it still doesn't appear, check whether Position is a custom object and whether Job Posting already has the maximum number of Master-Detail relationships.

    Do you see Position when creating a Lookup Relationship, or is it missing there as well? That can help identify the issue.

0/9000

Hello trailblazers, 

 

I will be working on a PoC where the use case is as follows: 

1. The client delivers a couple products to their customers (private and public) 

2. There are several suppliers who provide these products. 

3. The suppliers should have access to some sort  platform where they will report their CO2 emissions per product, their energy use for transport, audit material etc. 

4. AI structures the data and we get Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions across suppliers. 

 

I have previously worked on NZC implementation project. However it was a couple of years ago and no AI or supplier platform involved. 

 

 Any recommendations on what should I look into? 

Thanks in advance.

2 个回答
0/9000

Hi all, I've been trying to delete a Lightning record page. It gives me the error message that I cannot delete an Active lightning page, that I should deactivate it. 

 

I have been trying this multiple times, there are no assignments left when I check 'Activate' via the record page, but I do see it at page assignments (review the bottom line in the image).  

Unable to deactivate and delete a desktop assigned lightning page

Multiple different users have been trying to delete this page, but without success. Is there any other way to check what this page is assigned to or to delete it another way? 

 

Thanks in advance! 

9 个回答
  1. 6月5日 13:44

    The same issue here... Did you eventually found the solution? :)

0/9000
2 个回答
  1. 5月30日 12:49

    One thing to consider is how partial payments will be handled. In many implementations, loyalty points are converted into a monetary value and applied as a discount or credit against the invoice amount. If the points don't cover the full invoice, the remaining balance can be paid using the customer's regular payment method.

    It may also be helpful to define redemption limits, minimum point thresholds, and whether points can be combined with other promotions. These business rules often have a big impact on the overall customer experience.

0/9000

Any ideas on how to disable the "+new account" option on lookup fields on the Opportunity and Quote objects? Our users are bypassing required fields by using this shortcut instead of the New button on the Account object. We do have the new button on the account object set to override (at least we think we do), but this doesn't seem to actually be overriding anything. It still allows them to create the new account in the pop up alert and bypassing our requirements. So, in most cases the new account is created without an address and country. 

 

Just looking for any solutions to ensure users follow the correct account creation process. Thank you!

 

Is it possible to remove or disable creation of new record from search window?

4 个回答
0/9000

I have added a related list - single for the 'files' to replace the notes and attachment one. 

However, this Files related list does not appear for some users, but I can't seem to find out why. 

The user has access to the record, and is able to view the attachments in the Notes & Attachments related list AND when opening the Files Tab (record is owned by this user).

 

I feel I am missing a permission set, but still haven't figured out which one.. 

 

Anybody ever faced the same issue ? 

Thanks!

3 个回答
  1. 5月27日 12:25

    @Ricardo Santos - 2+ years late or otherwise, your response was really helpful to me in trying to sort a similar issue today, so I'm very grateful!

0/9000

 Hi, I’ve been trying to use the ConversationEntry object in a Flow (Get Records). I couldn’t get it to work as expected.    

To investigate, I used Salesforce Inspector Reloaded to query the ConversationEntry object. I noticed that the CreatedDate of the most recent record is October 22, 2025, which seems unusual.   

It looks like ConversationEntry records stopped being created after that date. Everything was working fine up until then, and I haven’t made any changes to channels or configurations (at least none that I’m aware of). 

Could you help me understand what might be causing this issue? 

4 个回答
  1. 5月23日 07:42

    The specific date (October 22, 2025) strongly suggests that this issue might be related to a Salesforce Release (like Winter '26) or a platform-wide update that rolled out around that time. 

     

    Here are a few things to consider and investigate: 

     

    1.Data Retention Policy / Messaging Data Archiving: Salesforce has strict data retention limits for messaging objects. It's possible that older ⁠ConversationEntry⁠ records are being archived or that new conversations are now being routed differently. 

     

    2.API Versioning in Flow: Check the API version of the Flow you are using. If the flow is running on a newer API version, ensure that ⁠ConversationEntry⁠ hasn't been restricted from direct "Get Records" queries without specific filter contexts (like ⁠ConversationId⁠). 

     

    3.Release Notes Check: Search the Salesforce Release Notes around October 2025 for any changes related to "Messaging for In-App and Web" or ⁠ConversationEntry⁠ behavior. Salesforce occasionally changes how system entries or transcript fragments are stored to optimize performance. 

     

    If your production channel is actively running but no new rows are appearing in Inspector, opening a Salesforce Support case to check if there is a backend synchronization issue for this specific object might be the quickest way.

0/9000

Hi all, looking for some advice on setting up some nuanced permissions in my org. My goal is to allow a single user to only view and edit records they own without limiting the record-level visibility and permissions my existing users already have. I want this user to see Accounts, Contacts, Opportunities, and Leads they own but none of these object records that they do not own and no other objects. I want them to be able to add Products to their Opportunities and edit those opportunities as well.

 

Some context on my org’s current setup:

 

  • OWDs on Account, Contact, Lead, Opportunity, and Product are either set to  Public/Read/Write or inherited as Public/Read/Write
  • I have several Custom Profiles which layer administrative allowances on top of allowing users to View and Edit key objects
    • For this user's Profile they have Read on Account, Contact, Opportunity, Lead, and Product plus “Create” and “Edit” on Opportunities
  • I have an intact Role Hierarchy.
    • I plan to place this user at the bottom of a branch

 

The issue with this setup is that, without narrowing the OWDs on the objects I want this user to engage with, they are able to see all records in our instance regardless. This makes sense given how their Profile would interact with the OWDs. I tried narrowing the OWDs for Account, Lead, Contact, and Opportunity to Private and this caused my remaining users to have visibility issues as well.

 

Is it possible to achieve the nuanced visibility I’m looking for using Sales Cloud?

3 个回答
  1. 5月18日 13:25

    This is definitely a tricky CRM permissions setup because your org already uses Public Read/Write OWDs, which means record visibility is broadly open by default. In situations like this, one possible approach is using a combination of a highly restricted Profile, Permission Sets, and potentially Apex managed sharing or restriction rules if your CRM supports them. Since the user should only access records they own while existing users keep their broader access, restriction rules may be the cleanest solution without impacting the current sharing model. You would also need to ensure Product access remains available so they can still associate Products with their Opportunities correctly.

    Honestly, permission structures like this remind me a lot of solving Letter Boxed NYT answers today. One small permission overlap can completely change the final outcome, just like one misplaced word connection can break the whole Letter Boxed puzzle. Both require careful planning, understanding dependencies, and finding the most efficient configuration without disrupting the rest of the system.

0/9000

In Salesforce, When I opened tasks tab, records are showing in split view. I can see table view after changing a display type button from Split view to table view until my system cache/browsing history deletes.   It will come back again to split view after deleted cache/browsing history.     Is there any setting/configuration that can make by default to table view?     

2 个回答
  1. 5月20日 10:40

    Hi @Tulasi Rajesh Kumar Reddy MV,  

     

    Salesforce doesn’t currently allow you to set Table View as a permanent default for Task   list views. The system stores your view preference in browser cache storage, so when cache or browsing history is cleared, it resets back to the default Split View.

    There’s no org-level or user setting to change this permanently. The only workaround is to manually switch to Table View again or use a bookmarked URL after selecting Table View.

0/9000