Skip to main content

#Admin Design Principles0 diskutieren mit

I run my own Podcast Series that inspires you to Be More of every role in the Salesforce Ecosystem

 

For a recent episode I was joined by @Pallavi Agarwal for Be More UX Designer.

 

I really enjoyed our chat where we discuss a 'Design Way of Thinking' and the fact we should be Designing by Humans for Humans

 

Check it out now on Youtube;

https://youtu.be/Ti8LRKyfD_w?si=225fjK1XFR_F-3ea

 

Also available in Audio Only on Spotify and other Podcast Platforms;

https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/tomforce92/episodes/Be-More-UX-Designer-with-Pallavi-Agarwal-e28eno0

 

  #Salesforce #Admin Design Principles #Design Strategy #User Experience #Uxdesign #DesignersMind #Experience Design #BeMore

 

@Bhavin Patel @Trailblazer Community Cove @* Salesforce Platform * @Architect Group, London, UK @* Salesforce Developers * @* Salesforce Administrators * @Design Trailblazers @Salesforce Business Analysts

2 Kommentare
0/9000

Our upper management would like to hear if other organizations are creating multiple custom fields on the contact object to identify the various ways the organization thinks of the contact and how the contact interacts with the organization (using flows to automatically assign the relevant value based on actual activity), or if you take the approach not to duplicate data that can be easily viewed and filtered in related lists (through Opportunities, Affiliations, Campaigns, etc.) and reported on, only creating custom fields for data that would be difficult to gather into a single report.  For example, which of the following would be your approach? If you take the custom field approach, how do you limit your custom fields? How do you limit which data that is captured elsewhere and is viewable in a related list or easily reported on is also documented in custom fields?

 

Database Design: Contact Custom Fields vs. Contact Related Lists

 

*We are using an Account record type of Internal Group to collocate contacts who serve a function with the organization or belong to some group we defined to think of or work with them in a certain way.  We have dozens of such groups.

 

#Best Practices #Admin Design Principles

12 Antworten
  1. 10. Aug. 2023, 16:34

    I'm going to definitely agree. If understanding about applications, enrollment, program engagement, etc had been around 15 years ago, I would not have created a lot of what I did. Manually entered contact information should be info that doesn't change or when it does, the old data is useless (such as an old address or an old email... not entirely useless but not that helpful, either). Data that represents something that changes or something that is renewed should be in a subsidiary record (entrollment, application, etc). And data about a transaction (donation, volunteer event, in-kind donation, program delivery) should be captured, connected and help drive automatic fields that characterize and budket contacts. You can swap ownership around, limit or open up visiblity and all sorts of thigns to help users (none of which I do yet), but work on capturing thye transactional, connect it ot the contacts, and help the data "speak" on it's own for operations, reporting, and planning.

    --Terry

0/9000
3 Kommentare
  1. 6. Aug. 2023, 17:40

    Thanks for the insight! I can see AI generating hundreds of user stories for a large project, freeing up BAs and product owners to work on what AI doesn't generate.  I  have a few questions:

    • How did you develop requirements well enough to prompt AI to write high-quality stories?
    • How does a product owner and development team manage the onslaught of hundreds of generated user stories?
    • Will you answer these questions in GPT Dreamin'?
0/9000