Whenever an internal user assigns a task for community user ,email notifications are not getting triggered. Even there are no records in email log files.
what could be the issue here?
#Salesforce Developer #Salesforce Admin #Email Deliverbility
Whenever an internal user assigns a task for community user ,email notifications are not getting triggered. Even there are no records in email log files.
what could be the issue here?
#Salesforce Developer #Salesforce Admin #Email Deliverbility
Hi! I was wondering if anyone else was experiencing this. We have been getting a much lower than normal open rate the past two monthly sends. We used to average between 40-50% open rate but have now dropped to 29% for each send (august & september). I first thought it was our subject line but don't think that's the cause anymore. Our delivered emails remain the same so no drop in that.
I did research on the Gmail update that happened in July that penalizes larger lists and prioritizes engagement. We do have a lot of unengaged subscribers which I am thinking could be the cause of this. Would it be worth cleaning out these subscribers to see if this fixes the issue? Any other recommendations or think this may be something else?
#Marketing Cloud #Email Deliverbility
The behavior you’re seeing is related to your Salesforce edition. List Email isn’t available in the Starter Edition; it requires Essentials or a higher edition.
Once you upgrade, you can use List Email to send your existing Lightning email templates to multiple contacts while retaining merge fields and personalization.
You can confirm the supported editions in Salesforce’s List Email documentation .
Hi,
When emails are sent from cases, don't receive any out-of-office messages or failed email messages. In one case there was a typo error in the email address, but didn’t receive an error message like the one you get when you send an email incorrectly in Outlook. Can Salesforce capture and display Out-of-Office responses or email bounce-back messages for emails sent from Cases? Are there any email settings, Email-to-Case configurations, or deliverability options that need to be enabled to receive these notifications?
Thanks.
#Salesforce Admin #Salesforce Developer #Service Cloud #Case Management #Email Deliverbility #Email
One important nuance to add to Kundan's answer, because this trips people up on Cases specifically:
Bounce Management (Setup > Deliverability) flags the Contact/Lead/Person Account record, not the Case. Even with it enabled you will not get a bounce badge on the Case's email message itself, and 'Return bounced emails to sender' delivers the bounce notice to the sending user's own inbox, not onto the Case timeline. It also only kicks in reliably when the recipient resolves to a Contact/Lead/Person Account email, a free-typed typo address that matches no record can bounce with nothing flagged in Salesforce at all. That is most likely why your typo case showed nothing.
How OOO replies and bounce (NDR) messages actually behave: they are just inbound emails sent back to whatever From/Reply-To you used. If you send from the Case using your Email-to-Case routing address, those replies DO come back into Salesforce, but by default they usually create a brand-new Case rather than attaching to the original, unless threading matches them up (Lightning header-based Email-to-Case threading, or the legacy Ref ID token in the subject/body). So the first thing I would check: search for Cases created from the mailer-daemon or the recipient's mail server around that time. Your OOO and bounce messages are probably sitting there as separate cases.
If what you actually need is a reliable per-message 'did this bounce?' status shown on the Case, native Case email sending does not expose that. For that, route sending through an external email service/relay that reports bounces via webhook (e.g. SendGrid, or Email Relay with a mail server that returns delivery status), or use Marketing Cloud / Account Engagement for tracked sends. Those give true delivered/bounced status per message.
Quick checklist:
1. Setup > Deliverability: Bounce Management ON (flags Contact/Lead recipients).
2. Confirm you are sending with the Email-to-Case routing address as From/Reply-To so replies return to Salesforce.
3. Verify Email-to-Case threading (Lightning threading or Ref ID) so OOO/bounce replies attach to the original Case instead of spawning new ones.
4. For guaranteed per-message bounce status, use an external relay with bounce webhooks or MC/Account Engagement.
If this helps, please mark it as the Best Answer so it is easy for the next person to find. Thanks :)
Hi all, hoping to get some real-world input on an Email Relay / deliverability issue we've been chasing.
The problem:
Our org has Salesforce configured with an Email Domain Filter (catch-all, */*) routing all outbound mail through an Email Relay pointed at our Google Workspace SMTP relay service. We've started getting persistent 550-5.7.1 "Invalid credentials for relay" bounces — root cause is that Salesforce sends from a large, rotating pool of outbound IPs, and our relay's IP allowlist can't keep up. This affects everything from Opportunity Update Reminders to account-transfer notifications, not just bulk sends.
Our Current setup:
Questions for the community:
Appreciate any first-hand experience — trying to land on something maintainable rather than another band-aid.
#Email Deliverbility
Hi Jaylen - really well-framed question, and the core of it is one architectural constraint: Salesforce Email Relay can't do SMTP AUTH (there's no username/password in the relay config), so the receiving relay has to trust Salesforce either by IP or by TLS certificate. Google Workspace's SMTP relay only offers IP allowlist or SMTP auth - no cert-domain matching - and since Salesforce can't authenticate, you're left maintaining the IP allowlist forever. That's why it feels like a treadmill: with Google as the relay target, it genuinely is a dead-end.
Two maintainable exits:
1) Drop the relay and send direct with full auth (my default recommendation). Configure DKIM keys in Salesforce (Setup > DKIM Keys), SPF with include:_spf.
salesforce.com, and a DMARC record. Direct sending with SPF + DKIM + DMARC alignment holds up well to Gmail/Outlook/Yahoo - it satisfies the 2024 bulk-sender requirements natively - and it removes the IP-allowlist maintenance entirely. On your Q1: deliverability direct is generally as good or better, because you drop a hop and stop inheriting a relay's reputation.
2) If you must keep a relay for compliance, move the target from Google to Exchange Online and use the TLS-certificate connector method instead of IP allowlisting (your Q4). EXO inbound connectors can authenticate Salesforce by the domain on its TLS cert, which survives IP rotation - Google's relay can't do that. Salesforce's cert renews over time, but the domain EXO matches on has stayed stable, so it's held up as a maintainable approach.
On Q2 (reasons to keep the relay): the legitimate ones are outbound archiving/journaling, DLP scanning, org-wide disclaimers, and 'all egress through one gateway' security policies. If none of those are mandated, you can safely drop it - Bounce Management, DKIM, and Email Security Compliance all work fine without the relay. The relay's real value is compliance/DLP, not deliverability.
On Q3 (SendGrid/Mailgun/Postmark/SMTP2GO): heads-up - those authenticate via API-key SMTP AUTH, which (per the constraint above) Salesforce's relay can't supply. So they don't slot in cleanly as a Salesforce relay target unless they also offer IP-based acceptance, and you'd be back to the same problem plus shared-pool reputation risk on transactional mail.
Net: for 'maintainable, not another band-aid' - go direct-with-DKIM if you don't have a hard archiving/DLP mandate, and EXO-with-TLS-cert if you do. Google-relay-plus-IP-allowlist is the one path that can't be made low-maintenance, because of the no-SMTP-AUTH limitation.
Hope that helps you land it!
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for clarification on the current behavior of Salesforce Organization-Wide Email Address (OWEA) verification.
Historically, when an Organization-Wide Email Address was created, Salesforce sent a verification email to the specified address. The recipient could open the email, click the verification link, and the address would become verified.
We are now seeing a scenario where selecting the verification link redirects the recipient to a Salesforce login page instead of completing the verification process.
A Salesforce Support representative indicated that, following a recent Salesforce release, the person opening the verification link may need to authenticate with Salesforce to complete the verification process. However, I have not been able to find any official documentation or release notes that describe this change.
The Salesforce documentation I found states that each organization-wide address requires verification and that an admin verifies a new organization-wide address by clicking the link in the email sent after creating the address, but I don't see any mention of a Salesforce login requirement for the recipient.
My questions are:
Any insight or links to official documentation would be greatly appreciated.
#Organization-Wide Email Addresses #Email Deliverbility #Information Security Salesforce #Setup & Configuration #Email
Yep, you're not the first to notice this! Check out @Michael Kolodner's post here: https://trailhead.salesforce.com/trailblazer-community/feed/0D5KX00000pOw590AC https://www.freelikeapuppy.tech/post/unverifiable
There's also this Knowledge article:
https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=005388172&type=1Deliverability Tips Series
The @* Marketing Cloud Engagement * Deliverability team brings you helpful tips and guidance to build and maintain a great sending reputation.
In this post, we wanted to share information about "branded mail" in Apple, it's not BIMI, it's unique to Apple's new Business Connect solution which is free for companies to sign up for. Senders must have DMARC configured to display their logo.
Deliverability Tips Series
The @* Marketing Cloud Engagement * Deliverability team brings you helpful tips and guidance to build and maintain a great sending reputation.
In today's post we share resources that may help with your Cyber Week campaign planning.
➡️ Holiday Readiness Article: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=002376589&type=1
➡️ Preparing for Peak Volume Blog: https://www.salesforce.com/blog/email-deliverability-readiness-peak-volume/
➡️ Impact of Cyber Week Volumes on Sender Reputation Blog: https://www.salesforce.com/blog/cyber-week-impact/
➡️ Deliverability Resource Homepage: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.mc_es_email_deliverability.htm&type=5
Deliverability Tips Series
The @* Marketing Cloud Engagement * Deliverability team shares valuable insights to help you build and maintain a strong sending reputation. Today, we discuss the dangers of list purchasing and its impact on your sender reputation. While buying lists might seem like a quick way to grow your audience, it can lead to significant problems. Here's why:
The Hazards of List Purchasing in SFMC
Purchasing email lists often violates privacy laws like:
GDPR in the EU
CAN-SPAM Act in the U.S.
CCPA in California
Non-compliance can result in hefty fines and penalties.
Conclusion
While list purchasing may offer a quick audience boost, the risks outweigh the benefits. Building an organic, permission-based audience ensures compliance, protects your brand reputation, and leads to more effective marketing. In the long run, focusing on quality will drive better engagement and sustainable success.
Alternatives to List Purchasing in SFMC
To avoid the risks of list purchasing, focus on organic list-building strategies. Here are some effective alternatives:
#Email Deliverability Issues #Email Deliverbility #Marketing Cloud
Deliverability Tips Series
The @Marketing Cloud Deliverability team brings you helpful tips and guidance to build and maintain a great sending reputation.
In this post we’ll talk about IP capacity.
Did you know that mailbox providers limit the amount of mail an IP address can send in a day? This is not a Marketing Cloud restriction but is tied closely to how mailbox providers view your reputation as a sender. Sending large amounts of mail through a single IP can appear as 'spammy' behavior to many mailbox providers.
Where we start seeing deferrals from major mailbox providers occur is typically once a customer starts sending 2M+ emails per day through a single IP.
3 key points to keep in mind:
* 1 Dedicated IP can send a maximum of 2.5M million sends per day (24 hour window), once you reach 2M sends per day it's time to start adding IP capacity for your campaigns.
* Project ahead for growth; if you’re going to need more IP(s) to accommodate volume in the next 1-3 months, add them now. New IPs will require a IP warm-up plan.
* Mailbox providers are on high alert Oct. - Dec. as mail volume spikes due to the retail season (Cyber Week). Learn more about how Cyber Week volume impacts a sender's reputation in our latest blog.
Remember that deliverability success is reflective of sending practices. If you are sending more than the recommended volume and seeing a decrease in deliverability or an increase in deferrals, it may be time to review your email program and IP configuration.
#Marketing Cloud #Email Deliverability Issues #Email Deliverbility
@* Marketing Cloud Engagement * Tis the season to be sure you have enough sending infrastructure in place to support your holiday sending!
A client had a question around automated emails send via approval processes. They are sending automated approval emails and want it to show as coming directly from the user. Is this possible?
Hello,
You can overrirde this with a Organisation Wide Email Address on the Process Automation Settings page.
Thanks, Tom