Skip to main content
추천 그룹

* Manufacturing Cloud & Rebate Mgmt *

Welcome! This group is dedicated to your success with Salesforce Manufacturing Cloud & Rebate Management. Join the conversation here to stay up to date on the product, learn best practices, and everything in between. Use this group to review resources, ask questions, help each other, and share experiences. --------------------------------------- This group is maintained and moderated by Salesforce employees. The content received in this group falls under the official Forward-Looking Statement: http://investor.salesforce.com/about-us/investor/forward-looking-statements/default.aspx

Is it built in-house with Flow, handled through a third-party AP tool, or still manual? Curious what's working and what's painful for teams managing this at scale.  

 

Disclosure: I work on Quick Payable, a Salesforce-native AP automation app. I'm trying to understand what's actually working for teams in this space before assuming we have the answer.

답변 4개
  1. 9월 1일 오전 8:21

    Hi @Brijesh Tekrawala

     

     

    TL and DR on multi plant invoice routing/PO matching in Salesforce: 

    • Manual/Excel still common, especially where plants ran separate AP pre-consolidation. No audit trail, biggest pain point.
    • Homegrown Flow + Apex - Flow for routing, Apex for 3-way match logic. Breaks down on: plant-specific approval matrices (hardcoded → brittle), no native OCR (bolt-on needed), multi-currency/GL mapping gets messy.
    • AppExchange AP tools (your category) - wins when: multiple ERPs across plants, need line-level tolerance matching, want standard AP reporting out of the box.
    • Middleware + ERP-as-source-of-truth - larger manufacturers often let SAP/NetSuite do the matching, sync status to Salesforce for visibility only.

    Universal pain points regardless of approach:

     

     

    • Plant-level approval matrices as hardcoded logic vs. data-driven config
    • Partial receipts/partial invoicing against a PO
    • Vendor invoice format variance across plants
    • GL/cost center mapping drift when a plant's chart of accounts changes

     I hope you find the above information helpful. If it does, please mark it as Best Answer to help others too.

0/9000

⛰️ 🔐 New Hands-on Workshop for Premier & Signature Admins: Secure the Org: Find and Fix Vulnerabilities (ADX012)

 

 Misconfigured security settings are one of the leading causes of data breaches. In this 90-minute instructor-led workshop, you'll step into the role of an internal security auditor to identify and fix real Salesforce vulnerabilities across the most common misconfiguration areas. 

 

This workshop was adapted from a fan-favorite capture-the-flag game that has been a hit at live Salesforce events — now available virtually so more admins can play! This practical workshop is for:

  • Newer admins — you'll find the challenges approachable and manageable. The hands-on format makes security feel less daunting and more actionable
  • Seasoned practitioners — you'll likely discover security settings you haven't previously been aware of
  • All learners — challenges are independent of each other, so you can move at your own pace, skip ahead, and circle back with no pressure

Sessions are live and available!

  • Fri Jul 31 — 9:00am ET [AMER]
  • Mon Aug 3 — 3:30pm ET [AMER]
  • Tue Aug 11 — 10:00am CET [EMEA]
  • Check the session listings for more workshops across regions 

➡️ Premier and Signature customersRegister today on Trailhead Academy — Course code: ADX012

 

#Security

댓글 12개
0/9000
Saurabh Wankhede 님이 #Manufacturing Cloud에 질문했습니다

We're evaluating Salesforce-native ERP solutions for a growing manufacturing and distribution business. Our priorities are:

  •  Inventory Management 
  •  Procurement 
  •  Warehouse Management 
  •  Manufacturing 
  •  Finance 
  •  Order Management 
  •  Native Salesforce integration 

We're currently comparing:

  •  Cloudy Business Ops 360 
  •  Rootstock ERP 
  •  Certinia ERP (FinancialForce) 
  •  Ascent ERP 
  •  QT9 ERP 
  •  Kenandy (legacy) 

Has anyone implemented any of these? Which one would you recommend based on implementation time, usability, scalability, and total cost of ownership?   

 

@* Manufacturing Cloud & Rebate Mgmt * 

답변 1개
  1. 7월 23일 오후 8:26

    You may also want to explore GLOVIA.  

    Based on the requirements you've mentioned, it's one of the strongest AppExchange solutions available. While it is lighter on the financial capabilities side however it offers robust functionality for inventory management, order management, warehouse management (WMS), and procurement.  

     

    Additionally, it is a 100% Salesforce-native solution, which makes implementation and integration within the Salesforce ecosystem much simpler. 

     

    https://appexchange.salesforce.com/appxListingDetail?listingId=a0N300000016bBSEAY

0/9000

I am curious to hear how everyone is deploying updates to data processing engines.  We currently use DevOps Center and it is a struggle to say the least for deploying these. The issues we face:

  • New fields referenced in the data processing engine cannot be deployed WITH the data processing engine.  They must be deployed before or created directly in the target environment
  • Because DPE's do not support versions, we have to deactivate one in order to deploy the latest updates. 

 

I feel like I need to join a Data Processing Engine support group.  

답변 2개
  1. 6월 17일 오후 6:47
    @Tiago Tancredi Soares no I was not. The struggles continued while we worked to deploy these. Happy to discuss the challenges and how we worked through them if that would be helpful.
0/9000

This group is pretty quiet! I’m curious about the adoption of Manufacturing Cloud across different clients. I have worked with different manufacturing clients, but I rarely see companies actually into manufacturing cloud. Does anyone have a different experience? I would love to hear from those who are actively using it. 

0/9000

Hi All,     We have a 10 year contract for a customer that we're going to manage with a Sales Agreement. We'd like to manage it with monthly schedules, but with the limitation of 72 schedules, it sounds like that means we can only do Sales Agreements monthly for 6 years. We could contact Salesforce to increase this limit to 100, but who knows if down the road we encounter a 15 or 20 year contract.     Is the best way to manage agreements monthly that are over 6 years to break them up into multiple Sales Agreements? Like two 5-year agreements?

@* Manufacturing Cloud & Rebate Mgmt *

@* Sales Cloud - Best Practices * 

답변 3개
  1. 2월 5일 오후 3:12

    I ended up creating some customization for this. I created a custom object called "Large Sales Agreement," and a flow screen tied to an action on the Sales Agreement called "Extend Sales Agreement." 

     

    When selected, I collect a little information from the user, but it works very similar to Renewing, except my flow creates a Large Sales Agreement record, and adds the two Sales Agreements together as child records to it. 

     

    Then I displayed a flow screen component on that Sales Agreement that displays a datatable of the two Sales Agreements and their totals, allowing my user to see the total Sales Agreement value of any Sales Agreements tied to my Large Sales Agreement. 

     

    If the user chooses to extend again, then the third Sales Agreement gets added and so on.

0/9000

Hello,    We are planning to utilize the capabilities of Salesforce Manufacturing Cloud with a customer who is using an LWR community. Has anyone had experience integrating Manufacturing Cloud with LWR? I haven’t been able to find any references confirming whether the Business Rules Engine can be used within an LWR community.    Thanks in advance!

@* Manufacturing Cloud & Rebate Mgmt * 

답변 1개
0/9000

Hello everyone -   Does anyone have suggestions or guidance as to solutions available in the Manufacturing cloud (or other) around capturing inspection data both at the point of production (machines) and by batch (Final Inspection).  Ultimately, the process would include creating (or interfacing with a CAD software) to create ballooned prints and then be available for data capture.    Much appreciated!   @* Manufacturing Cloud & Rebate Mgmt * 

답변 1개
  1. 2025년 12월 22일 오전 4:47

    You can leverage Action Plans and Assessment Tasks to manage and capture inspection data. Action Plans can be used to capture high-level inspection information, while Assessment Tasks

    can represent the individual activities or step-by-step checks performed during the inspection process. 

     

    Additionally, if inspections are executed as part of a planned onsite or remote engagement, Visits can be utilized to align the inspection with an overall visit plan and provide better scheduling, tracking, and execution visibility.

0/9000

Hello 

 

I am new to Manufacturing cloud so my question is perhaps not relevant. 

In the documentation,  and in Trailhead,  the claim object is always presented as a request by a partner to be compensated.     

Is it the same object that can be used if we want the customer to enter directly a claims via  Experience cloud by example ?  

 

and what is the role of the "partner fund claim"  vs the claim object ?  

 

Regards 

Jérôme

답변 2개
  1. 2025년 12월 3일 오후 2:45

    Hi @Jerome Devemy

    The claim object in Manufacturing Cloud is primarily used for warranty claims. It represents a warranty claim submitted by a partner to a manufacturer or a supplier recovery claim submitted by the manufacturer to a supplier.  

    This object can also be configured to allow customers to submit claims directly via an Experience Cloud site. This involves setting up related objects like Claim, Claim Item, Claim Coverage, Claim Coverage Payment Details, and Claim Participant. Manufacturers can also create claims on behalf of partners if needed. 

    For more details, refer: 

    Capture Warranty Claims

    The "Partner Fund Claim" is a separate concept used in the context of Market Development Funds (MDF). It allows partners to submit claims for reimbursement of marketing expenses or other fund-related activities.  

    Partner Fund Claims are managed through the Partner Central Experience Cloud site. Channel Account Managers (CAMs) or financial departments can approve and reimburse these claims.

    For more details, refer: Configure Partner Fund Claims

      

     

    Key Differences:

    • The Claim Object is used for warranty or supplier recovery claims, while the Partner Fund Claim is specific to Market Development Funds and partner reimbursements.
    • Both can be configured for use in Experience Cloud, but their purposes and workflows differ.

    Hope this helps. Thanks!

0/9000