Skip to main content

#Outlook/Teams/Gmail40 debatiendo

We are following the instructions in the following article :  

https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sales.inbox_graph_migration.htm&type=5

  

to upgrade our Microsoft Office 365 Authentication Method to Microsoft Graph in Inbox. As a  prior condition,  when our Azure admin clicks on the link in Option B in the following article: 

https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=000383477&type=1

 

They are getting the following consent window :  

 

Upgrade Microsoft Office 365 Authentication Method to Microsoft Graph in Inbox

 

 Would anyone confirm if this is the correct consent window for the Microsoft Graph API in Azure portal? My concern is that the permission labels listed in this window, like 'Read and write user mail', 'Read and write user calendars', etc.., are not related to the Graph API. 

 

#Outlook/Teams/Gmail

 

@* Outlook/Teams, Gmail, and Inbox *

1 respuesta
0/9000

Main concerns are email thread tracking, emails tagging to unrelated records, etc. We see the email at the contact level but not consistently at the account level in the timeline. Only able to connect to one contact record (previously the email would be shown on as may contacts as email matches) and Opportunity references which is not following the email of the contact role. Has anyone else experienced this? Any suggestions for how to remedy within the Email to Activity managed flow?

 

@Salesforce Flow Automation @* Service Cloud * 

3 respuestas
  1. 13 jul, 17:49

    @Lakshmi Achary

     

    Thank you for the response! Can you elaborate modifying the above to use matching rules to only connect to Opportunity when a Contact Role matches email send value? Also, I want to associate emails to multiple contacts (if the to email matches multiple contacts on different accounts) - can this flow be extended to accommodate this as well?

0/9000

Outlook Integration side panel returns no matched Contacts for a specific email message; identical sibling message in same thread matches all Contacts correctly. Reproducible per-message, all users, all sessions.     Symptom

When users select a specific received email in Outlook and open the Salesforce side panel, no external Contacts are matched or displayed — the entire external participant list is missing, not just one person. All six external participants have existing Contact records with exactly matching email addresses.

A second email in the same thread, from the same sender, with the identical recipient list, matches and displays all Contacts correctly.

Reproducibility

  • Failure is consistent per message: the affected message fails every time it is selected.
  • Failure reproduces for every user who opens the message, ruling out per-user session, permission set, or cache state as the sole cause.
  • The working sibling message succeeds every time, for every user, ruling out org config, Contact data, and matching settings.

Anyoneon have any suggestions here?   

 

@* Outlook/Teams, Gmail, and Inbox * 

1 respuesta
  1. 6 jul, 20:32

    Based on the symptoms, I would first look at the email itself rather than Salesforce configuration.

    The interesting part is that:

    * The same Contacts match correctly on another email in the same thread

    * All users are seeing the same behavior

    * The issue happens only for one specific message

    That usually points toward something different in the email metadata/header information.

    A few things I would check:

    1. Compare the working email and failing email headers:

    * From address

    * Reply-To address

    * To/Cc values

    * Message identifiers

    Sometimes two emails can look identical in Outlook but have different underlying header information that Salesforce uses for Contact matching.

    2. Check how the failing email was generated:

    * Was it forwarded?

    * Sent through a shared mailbox?

    * Routed through another system?

    * Generated by a distribution list or automation?

    3. If the email has been logged in Salesforce, compare the EmailMessage details:

    * FromAddress

    * ToAddress

    * CcAddress

    * Headers

    * ThreadIdentifier

    Since the issue follows the message and not the user, permissions, cache, or user settings would be lower on my troubleshooting list.

    My first suspicion would be that Salesforce is not able to correctly extract the external participants from that specific email because of something different in the message headers.

0/9000

Hi Salesforce  Microsoft moved the hard end of EWS from October 26 to April 27.  https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/exchange/exchange-online-ews-your-time-is-almost-up/4492361  Will Lightning Sync continue to run?  That would help companies to move with time and concept to a new solution   

1 respuesta
  1. 30 jun, 01:37

    @Andreas Rosen

     

    The short answer: yes, Lightning Sync will keep running past October 2026 and up to April 2027, but only if you take a specific admin action first. It won't keep running automatically.

     

    Microsoft's new plan isn't a single hard cutoff. It's a phased, admin-controllable disablement that begins October 1, 2026 and concludes with permanent shutdown on April 1, 2027. The critical part is what happens by default at the October date. Beginning October 1, 2026, EWS is blocked unless the tenant configures an AppID Allow List and sets EWSEnabled=True. Without admin action, Microsoft sets EWSEnabled=False and EWS apps stop working. 

     

    So for Lightning Sync specifically, this means: if you do nothing, your sync likely breaks in October 2026, not April 2027. To get the full runway to April 2027 that you're hoping for, your Exchange admin needs to add the Salesforce EWS app to an AppID Allow List and set EWSEnabled=True. Microsoft recommends doing this before the end of August 2026, because tenants that complete it before the deadline are excluded from the automatic October 1st blocking. After April 1, 2027 there are no exceptions and no extensions. 

     

    On the Salesforce side, the position is consistent with this. Salesforce confirms that Lightning Sync configurations using EWS won't capture or sync data after EWS is retired, and recommends either migrating the Microsoft connection to Microsoft Graph or moving from Lightning Sync to Einstein Activity Capture. Worth knowing that the Graph connection for the Microsoft side is still relatively new, so test it rather than assuming a clean swap. 

     

    So to directly answer your planning question: yes, you can buy yourself the time to April 2027 to move to a new solution with proper concept and care, which is exactly the sensible approach. But that extra time is not automatic. The action item is to have your Exchange admin set up the AppID Allow List with EWSEnabled=True before end of August 2026. Miss that, and your bridge collapses in October 2026 instead.

     

    One thing I'd flag for your migration planning, since you mentioned wanting to move with proper concept. If your end goal is Einstein Activity Capture, be aware of a key behavioral difference. Lightning Sync syncs contacts and calendar events. EAC covers events and contacts too, but it does not support shared calendars, resource calendars, or delegated calendars. If any of your users rely on shared or room calendars flowing into Salesforce today, that's a gap you'll want to design around before committing, rather than discovering it mid-migration. Better to surface that now while you have the runway. 

    -SP

0/9000

Hi,    We are currently emailing from case to external customers. When one of my team is out of office, how do I get notifications that a case that is in their queue received a new email from a customer? Or is there a good way to monitor their cases when they are OoO? Is there a way to automatically add cases that they are owners of to a queue/report when they have setup an OoO?    

1 respuesta
  1. 2 jul, 14:52

    Hi, If the user has already setup OOO using chatter and user go on vacation then it can be monitored. Build a schedule flow, that will run at 1 am (or anytime) daily. It'll pull the users of the support team. It'll now use Get Records element to get the object OutOfOffice with a filter where userid equal to triggering record userid. Lets say there are 5 users in support team and one is ooo then 1 record will be pulled from Get Records element. In this way flow will know that user is ooo, now Update Records element can be used that will reassign the case to another user who is available. Basic view of flow is attached

    https://trailhead.salesforce.com/trailblazer-community/feed/0D54S00000MjKvoSAFHi, If the user has already setup OOO using chatter and user go on vacation then it can be monitored. Build a schedule flow, that will run at 1 am (or anytime) daily.Another solution suggested below

    https://sforcemaximizer.com/how-to-reassign-tasks-when-the-task-owner-is-out-of-the-office-with-automation-in-salesforce/

0/9000

Hi  Our Users have downloaded the Salesforce for Outlook App, but when they click on the view Salesforce button - they are prompted for their Username and Password.    We all have access to SSO, so expected them to have direct access to our org    Is there anything we should be doing   

 

@* Outlook/Teams, Gmail, and Inbox * 

1 respuesta
  1. 28 jun, 00:06

    This is a very common gotcha — the default login screen in the Outlook integration shows username/password, but SSO is there, it's just hidden behind the Custom Domain step. Here's exactly what your users need to do:

    1. Open Outlook and click the Salesforce icon in the sidebar or ribbon to open the Salesforce panel
    2. On the login screen, look at the bottom and click "Use Custom Domain"
    3. In the field that appears, type your org's My Domain name — just the subdomain, not the full URL (e.g. if your login URL is yourcompany.my.salesforce.com, enter yourcompany)
    4. Click Continue
    5. The screen will now show your SSO login button (usually labeled with your company name or identity provider, e.g. "Log in with Microsoft" or "Log in with Okta")
    6. Click that button and authenticate through your normal SSO flow

    Once they've done this once, Outlook should remember the custom domain for future logins.

    If the SSO button still doesn't appear after entering the custom domain, check two things in Salesforce Setup:

    • My Domain → confirm "Deploy to Users" has been clicked (not just enabled)
    • My Domain → Authentication Configuration → make sure your SSO provider is checked under "Authentication Services" — if it's unchecked, users won't see the SSO option even with the right domain entered

    Hope that gets them sorted!

0/9000

Good morning.  Can someone help me understand the upcoming Lightning Sync retirement, and if that will also affect Outlook Integration? I think they are separate tools, but I'm not certain.   My org wants every user to start using Outlook Integration to log emails in Salesforce, but I'm not certain it's worth the training time if the tool is going to be retired at the end of 2027.   

1 respuesta
  1. 21 jun, 04:18

    @Neil Shafer-Ross

     

    Three different products often get confused here, so let me separate them clearly because that's the whole answer.

    You're correct that they are separate tools. Here's the breakdown.

    Outlook Integration (formerly Lightning for Outlook) is the side panel that lives inside Outlook and lets reps log emails and view and create Salesforce records from their inbox. This is the tool your org wants everyone to use, and it is not being retired. Salesforce actively recommends the Outlook Integration, alongside Einstein Activity Capture, as the next-generation replacement product, and continues to introduce enhancements for it every release. So training your team on it is a safe investment, not wasted effort. 

     

    Salesforce for Outlook is the old desktop plugin, completely different from the Outlook Integration despite the similar name. This is the product retiring in December 2027, rescheduled from its earlier June 2024 date. If your org is on the modern Outlook Integration, this retirement does not affect you. I suspect the "end of 2027" date you heard is this product, and it's getting conflated with the tool you actually want to roll out. 

     

    Lightning Sync is the third tool, and it's a background sync engine for contacts and events between Outlook and Salesforce. It's separate again from both of the above. It's also on its way out. Salesforce stopped offering Lightning Sync to new customers back in the Winter '21 release, and its real death blow is coming from Microsoft's side, not Salesforce's. 

     

    So, to directly answer your question: yes, roll out Outlook Integration with confidence. It is the recommended, actively maintained tool, and it is not being retired. The 2027 retirement applies to the old Salesforce for Outlook plugin, which is a different product. Train your users without worrying about that date.  

    -SP

0/9000

Hello SF Community! 

 

Our sales reps want the ability to simply create an MS teams meeting invite from within SF (from a case, opportunity, etc). I know that the Salesforce App in MS Teams will allow you to access records from SF in this manner, but for anyone online that utilizes this,

 can you also create a Teams chat using a business email address?

  

Our  business utilizes our outlook emails (first.lastname@company.com), but our SF business emails are firstname@company.com. Hopefully this is enough info, but let me know if anyone out there has any questions. Thanks.  

 

@* Outlook/Teams, Gmail, and Inbox * @* Service Cloud * 

2 respuestas
  1. 21 jun, 07:54

    Hi Tony, 

     

    Great question! Here's what you need to know about using alternate email addresses with the Salesforce App for MS Teams: 

     

    Short answer: The Salesforce App for MS Teams uses the email address tied to your Microsoft/Teams identity (i.e., your Outlook/M365 login) when creating meeting invites and Teams chats — it does not natively allow you to swap in a different "from" email address like your SF business email. 

     

    However, here are your options: 

     

    1. Map the correct email in Salesforce User settings: 

    Make sure each Salesforce user's Email field matches their Outlook/M365 email (

    first.lastname@company.com

    ). The Teams app uses this mapping to link identities. If the emails don't match, it can cause issues with record association and invite creation. 

     

    2. Use Microsoft 365 email aliases: 

    If your org uses M365, you can add

    firstname@company.com

    as an email alias on the user's M365 account. This way, both email formats are associated with the same mailbox, and Teams meeting invites will still work correctly regardless of which format is used. 

     

    3. Salesforce Inbox / Einstein Activity Capture: 

    If you're using Salesforce Inbox or Einstein Activity Capture alongside the Teams integration, you can configure which email address is used for activity logging. This won't change the Teams meeting invite sender, but it helps ensure activities are captured against the right Salesforce records. 

     

    4. Custom workaround via Flow + Teams Connector: 

    For full control over meeting invites with a specific email, some teams use a Salesforce Flow + Microsoft Power Automate (Teams connector) approach to generate Teams meeting links programmatically and send them from the desired email address. 

     

    My recommendation: Start with Option 2 (M365 alias) as it's the simplest and doesn't require any Salesforce config changes. Hope this helps!

0/9000

Hello  I am using the pluggin salesforce on outlook and add contact to salesforce. But the field that appear doesn't match with what i want. Is it possible to change the layout ?  I try to directly change the layout on the contact layout but it make no changes.  Thanks   

1 respuesta
0/9000

I have two mass email templates with images. Is there any way to automatically make the images appear when opened vs recipients needing to click download pictures?  I don't want to send them as attachments because I suspect that would cause an even higher undeliverables rate.   

3 respuestas
  1. 17 jun, 12:49

    Yes, that's exactly as I expected, but my team wanted a different answer. Thanks for confirming, now it's not just me saying it to them :)

0/9000