I have two items related to reconfiguring bundles and how to handle existing subscriptions and assets.
First Bundle
Currently we have a bundle configured as below:
- Bundle Header (Parent) - Product A (renewable subscription that has a price associated with it)
- Child Product (product option) - Product B (one-time asset that has a price associated with it).
When added to a quote, since the child is not flagged as Bundled, pricing sits at both lines. The business now wants to re-design the bundle. They want it to look like the following:
- Bundle Header (Parent) - Product C (renewable subscription that has a $0 price)
- Child Product (product option) - Product A (renewable subscription that has a price associated with it).
- Child Product (product option) - Product B (one-time asset that has a price associated with it).
Pricing would sit at each child product line. I was thinking I could just reconfigure the bundle by creating the bundle header and adding Product A as a child and then Product B as a child. And remove the child option (product B) from from Product A (basically breaking the original bundle apart).
But my concern is existing data that was sold under the current configuration. Do I create subscription bundle headers and then realign the current subscriptions and assets to the new bundle header (adding the Root ID, Required By ID, adjust the product option information on each subscription and asset)? If so, what are the possible risks to amendments and renewals? If this is not the best approach what would you suggest? I can’t create new product codes so I need to use the current products and product codes.
Second Bundle
We have a one time subscription Service product that is part of two bundles. We want to break this apart from the bundles to make it standalone and have it only added on new sales quotes. This Service product is a one-time subscription product.
For new sales, I need to hide the options within the two bundles and have the product auto added. For amendments, I need the options available for the products being revised but if we are adding one of the two bundles for the first time we need the option for the Service product hidden in both bundles.
How would i build this? For new sales I am thinking a product selection rule to add the standalone product. For new sales a product selection rule to hide the options. For amendments, how would I approach this?
Thank you.
#Salesforce CPQ & Billing #CPQ #CPQAskAnExpert
Hi Rachel,
For the first bundle, I’d be cautious about manually changing the existing Subscription/Asset hierarchy (Root ID, Required By ID, Product Option, etc.). Those relationships are used by CPQ/Billing during amendments, renewals, and asset/subscription management, so manually realigning historical records could introduce issues later.
A safer approach is generally to keep the existing sold structure intact for historical subscriptions/assets and use the new bundle configuration for future sales. Since you need to retain the existing product codes, I’d validate the impact on amendments and renewals in a full sandbox before changing any existing subscription hierarchy.
For the second bundle, your approach of using Product Selection Rules for new sales makes sense. For amendments, I’d make the rule criteria aware of whether the quote is an amendment versus a new sale, and whether the bundle already exists on the customer's subscription/assets. That way, the Service product can remain available when amending an existing bundle while being excluded when the bundle is being added for the first time.
Because this involves existing subscription/asset relationships, I’d test several scenarios—new sale, renewal, amendment of the existing bundle, and adding the bundle for the first time—before deploying the configuration. If you can share the CPQ package version and how your amendment quotes are currently configured, it would help determine the exact rule conditions.
