Hi Liane, in your article about EDA TDTM you say "We recommend applying the Owned by Namespace field with a common value for all the Trigger Handler objects a developer has created. This gives them several advantages. First, using the Owned by Namespace field allows the developer to store the definitions in a class which can be saved in source control. Then they can pass their configuration into the EDA TDTM Global API and EDA will perform the processing for them."

I'm just curious more on the recommendation to use "Owned by Namespace" for custom developed stuff... is your primary point: "for easy segmentation of your custom records" vs EDA's vs an ISV also using TDTM? And by storing in a class, you mean the ability to have a class properly create your custom Trigger Handler records when moving to new environments? (I'm missing the piece about "EDA TDTM Global API",, is there a code example you can share? I understand how to write utilize TDTM for custom work) Thanks in advance!